DCF Methods and Implicit Re-Investment Assumptions: Changing Reinvestment Rate, Consequences And Modified Methods
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33516/maj.v58i6.99-102pKeywords:
No KeywordsAbstract
The estimates of NPV and IRR, computed in a conventional way, can emerge misleading, in the event, the reinvestment rate turns lower than the implicit rate of the model. If future reinvestment rates turn promising, the actual figure of NPV and IRR can emerge better. Contrary to this, if the future growth rates look very dull, NPV or IRR estimates will remain unrealized. Hence, to act rationally, trying the modified methods are recommended for the firms undertaking a project appraisal.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2023-06-01
How to Cite
Roy, D. (2023). DCF Methods and Implicit Re-Investment Assumptions: Changing Reinvestment Rate, Consequences And Modified Methods. The Management Accountant Journal, 58(6), 99–102. https://doi.org/10.33516/maj.v58i6.99-102p
Issue
Section
Investment Evaluation
References
Batra, R and Verma, S. (2017): Capital Budgeting Practices of Indian Companies, IIMB Management Review. Vol.29, No. 1, pp. 29-44
Brigham, E. F. and Houston, J. F. (2018): Fundamentals of Financial Management. Cengage, Boston, USA, p. 399
Ehrhardt, M. C. and Brigham, E. F. (2011): Financial Management: Theory and Practice, (13 edition), South Western, Cengage Learning, Mason, USA, p.392
Myers, S. C. (1974): Interactions of Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions: Implications for Capital Budgeting. Journal of Finance, March, pp. 1-25