DCF Methods and Implicit Re-Investment Assumptions: Changing Reinvestment Rate, Consequences And Modified Methods

Authors

  • Dipen Roy Professor, Department of Commerce, University of North Bengal, Darjeeling

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33516/maj.v58i6.99-102p

Keywords:

No Keywords

Abstract

The estimates of NPV and IRR, computed in a conventional way, can emerge misleading, in the event, the reinvestment rate turns lower than the implicit rate of the model. If future reinvestment rates turn promising, the actual figure of NPV and IRR can emerge better. Contrary to this, if the future growth rates look very dull, NPV or IRR estimates will remain unrealized. Hence, to act rationally, trying the modified methods are recommended for the firms undertaking a project appraisal.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2023-06-01

How to Cite

Roy, D. (2023). DCF Methods and Implicit Re-Investment Assumptions: Changing Reinvestment Rate, Consequences And Modified Methods. The Management Accountant Journal, 58(6), 99–102. https://doi.org/10.33516/maj.v58i6.99-102p

Issue

Section

Investment Evaluation

References

Batra, R and Verma, S. (2017): Capital Budgeting Practices of Indian Companies, IIMB Management Review. Vol.29, No. 1, pp. 29-44

Brigham, E. F. and Houston, J. F. (2018): Fundamentals of Financial Management. Cengage, Boston, USA, p. 399

Ehrhardt, M. C. and Brigham, E. F. (2011): Financial Management: Theory and Practice, (13 edition), South Western, Cengage Learning, Mason, USA, p.392

Myers, S. C. (1974): Interactions of Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions: Implications for Capital Budgeting. Journal of Finance, March, pp. 1-25

Similar Articles

<< < 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.