Corporate Social Responsibility At The Bottom of Pyramid
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33516/maj.v58i12.19-22pKeywords:
No KeywordsAbstract
The Companies Act, 2013, by mandating the spending on corporate social responsibility by corporates, has re-ignited the ever going debate on business and societal relationship. Keith Davis, one of the pioneers of the CSR debate raised two thought-provoking queries in the 1960s: “What does the business person owe society?” and “Can business afford to ignore its social responsibilities?”Despite the fact that even if as per going concern concept, businesses have indefinite life, it is the profit which fuels the businesses to go on indefinitely. The life of an enterprise can also come to an abrupt end, if it fails to earn profit for a prolonged period. Failure of an enterprise also disrupts the economic ecosystem created by it. Employees lose their jobs, Government loses tax revenue, associate companies lose the business opportunities, Bankers lose the loan amount, owners lose the investment etc. Thus, it can be said that one of the moral or ethical duty of the enterprise it to continue to operate, which is possible only by earning profits. Therefore, the concept of CSR should not be understood only as charity or philanthropic activities undertaken by the organisation but also the creation of symbiotic relationship with the society by building economic ecosystem. Bottom of Pyramid (BoP) concept provides one such opportunity and the CSR activities directed towards the BoP may be instrumental in achieving this objective.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
References
Nagwan, S (2014)“Evolution of Corporate Social Responsibility in India,” International Journal of Latest Technology in Engineering, Management & Applied Science, Volume III, Issue VII, July 2014, ISSN 2278 - 2540
Tripathi, A and Bains, A (2013) “Evolution of Corporate Social Responsibility: A journey from 1700 BC till 21st century,” International Journal of Advanced Research (2013), Volume 1, Issue 8, pp 788- 796, ISSN 2320-5407
Berger-Walliser, G and Scott, I (2018) “Redefining Corporate SocialResponsibility in an Era ofGlobalization and RegulatoryHardening,” American Business Law Journal, Volume 55, Issue 1, 167–218, Spring 2018
Muniapan, B and Dass, M (2008), “Corporate Social Responsibility: a philosophical approach from an ancient Indian perspective,” Int. J. Indian Culture and Business Management, Vol. 1, No. 4, 2008
Vijay Kumar, S. (2017), “Corporate Social Responsibility in India: An Over View,” Journal of Asian Business Management, Vol. 9, No. 1, January- June 2017: 53-67
Eric C. Chaffee (2017), “The Origins of Corporate Social Responsibility,” University of Cincinnati Law Review, Vol. 85, 2017
M. Todd Henderson (2007), “Everything Old Is New Again: Lessons from Dodge v. Ford Motor Company,” University of Chicago Law School, Coase-Sandor Working Paper Series in Law and Economics
Prahalad, CK (2005), “The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid,” ISBN 0-13-146750-6 9. Friedman, M (1970), “The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits,” published in The New York Times Magazine on September 13, 1970
Friedman, M, “Capitalism and Freedom” (1961)
The Companies Act, 2013
The Companies (Corporate Social Responsibility Policy Rules) 2014
Arnold, Denis G. and Valentin, Andres, Corporate Social Responsibility at the Base of the Pyramid (February 9, 2013). Journal of Business Research, 2013. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/ abstract=2214291
The Credit Suisse Global Wealth Report, 2022
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Corporate_social_responsibility
http://mallenbaker.net/article/clear-reflection/ definitions-of-corporate-social-responsibility-what-iscsr
https://blogs.worldbank.org/developmenttalk/ half-global-population-lives-less-us685-person-day.