Corporate Governance - A Case Study of Impact of Board Process on the Corporate Performance in India
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33516/maj.v57i5.82-86pKeywords:
No Keywords.Abstract
Corporate governance has gained much importance, attracting public attention all the times in the corporate world. This article attempts to study the impact of the Board process on corporate performance and the findings of the study reveal that dual position of CEO & Chairman have positive influence of Tobin’s Q, gender diversity doesn’t affect performance, Boards with age between 45-50 and the Board meeting held 4 to 6 times a year generate highest ROA.Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
References
Alshimmiri, T. (2004). Board Composition, Exectutive Remuneration, and Coprorate Performance: The Case of Reits. Corporate Ownersh¡p & Control, 2(1), 104-119.
Andres, P., Azofra, V., & Lopez, F. (2005). Corporate Boards in OECD Countries: Size, Composition, Function¡ng and Effectiveness. Corporate Governance, 13(2), 197-210. do¡: 10.1111/j.1467-8683.2005.00418.x.
Burkart, M., Gromb, D, and Panunzi, F. (1997) Large shareholders, monitoring, and the value of the firm, Quarterly Journal of Economics 112, 693-728
Dobbin, F., & Jung, J. (2011). Corporate Board Diversity and Stock Performance: The Competence Gap or Institutional Investor Bias? North Carolina Law Review.
Dutta, P., & Bose, S. (2006). Gender Diversity in the Boardroom and Financial Performance of Commercial Banks: Evidence from Bangladesh. The Cost And Management, 34(6), 70-74.
Ehikioya, B. i. (2009). Corporate governance structure and firm performance in developing economies: evidence from Nigeria. Corporate Governance, 9(3), 231-243. doi: 10.1108/14720700910964307.
Frick,B., & Bermig, A. (2009). Board Size , Board Composition and Firm Performance : Empirical Evidence from Germany. Media.
Heugens,P. P. M. a R., Essen, M., & Oosterhout, J. (2008). Metaanalyzing ownership concentration and firm performance in Asia: Towards a more fine-grained understanding. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 26(3), 481-512. do¡: 10.1007/s10490-008-9109-0.
Hossa¡n, M., Prevost, K., & Rao, P. (2001). Corporate governance in New Zealand: The effect of the 1993 Companies Act on the relation between board composition and firm performance. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 9(2), 119-145. do¡: 10.1016/S0927-538X(01)00003-8.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333056515_Board_ Of_Director_Meeting_And_Firm_Performance accessed on 17 Feb. 2022 at 21:31
https://www.researchgate. net/publication/343674517_Mechanism_of_Corporate_Governance_and_Transparency_of_Indonesian_Companies_Case_Study_of_Manufacturing_Companies_Listed_on_the_Indonesia_Stock_Exchange_ in_2015-2018 accessed on 23rd Feb,2022 at 18:15
IFC and State Securities Commission of V¡etnam. (2010, June). Corporate Governance Manual. international Review of Finance. doi: 10.1111/1468-2443.00034.
IFC and State Securities Commission Vietnam. (2006). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC)-Corporate Governance Country Assessment. Corporate Governance
Free Sample
Editorial Policy
