Deriving Value Propositions in Costing in Higher Education Institutions

Authors

  • Roopam Kothari Associate Professor School of Management IIS (Deemed to be University) Jaipur
  • Vimal Mishra General Manager (Corporate Affairs) Mahindra World City Jaipur Ltd. Jaipur
  • Mani Bhatia Associate Professor School of Commerce IIS (Deemed to be University) Jaipur

Keywords:

No Keywords.

Abstract

This research explores the strategic challenges faced by higher education institutions (HEIs) in pricing MBA programs amidst rising costs and evolving student needs. Emphasizing valuebased pricing and activity-based costing, the study delves into their roles in ensuring financial sustainability and competitive positioning. The National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 reforms in India shape MBA curricula towards industry collaboration and practical skill development, aligning with market demands. Through a survey of 200 final-year MBA aspirants, key attributes influencing program choices are identified, with placements and collaborations emerging as pivotal factors. Conjoint analysis reveals preferences for blended learning and industryintegrated curricula. Insights from utility estimates guide pricing decisions, emphasizing the importance of perceived value and fair cost assessment. Overall, the study underscores the significance of strategic pricing approaches in navigating the complexities of the higher education market and shaping institutional strategies for sustained success.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2024-05-01

How to Cite

Kothari, R., Mishra, V., & Bhatia, M. (2024). Deriving Value Propositions in Costing in Higher Education Institutions. The Management Accountant Journal, 59(5), 84–92. Retrieved from https://icmai-rnj.in/index.php/maj/article/view/173500

Issue

Volume 59, Issue 5, May 2024

Section

NEP

References

Blouin, D. D., & Raab, R. L. (2015). Activity-based costing in higher education. In D. D. Blouin & R. L. Raab (Eds.), The Handbook of Cost Management (pp. 303-326). John Wiley & Sons.

Cavenagh, A., & Smith, R. (2018). An overview of activitybased costing in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 40(4), 386-398.

Eckert, J. E., & Wells, R. S. (2017). Value-based pricing and higher education. Journal of Higher Education Management, 32(2), 125-134.

Gul, F. A., & Soner, N. (2016). Activity-based costing in higher education: A case study of 20 Turkish universities. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 17(3), 295-310.

Hu, X., Li, Y., & Li, Y. (2018). An empirical investigation of the relationship between activity-based costing and valuebased pricing in Chinese higher education institutions. Journal of Educational Administration, 56(3), 246-262.

Kempen, M. F., & von Leipzig, K. (2016). The relationship between activity-based costing and value-based pricing in higher education. Journal of Accounting Education, 36, 25-34.

Meltzer, J. P., & Kruk, M. E. (2017). Implementation of activity-based costing in higher education: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Accounting Education, 41, 26-39.

Quintana-García, C., & Benavides-Velasco, C. A. (2017). Activity-based costing and value-based pricing in Spanish universities. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 39(4), 396-410.

Turner, T. A., & Van Auken, H. (2016). Activity-based costing in higher education: A strategic approach for institutional sustainability. Strategic Finance, 98(11), 38-45.

Wang, T. H., & Chiu, Y. C. (2019). An empirical investigation of the relationship between activity-based costing and value-based pricing in Taiwanese higher education institutions. Higher Education, 78(4), 719-735.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.