Efficiency Measurement of Indian Sugar Manufacturing Firms - A DEA Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33516/rb.v41i4.66-77pKeywords:
Technical Efficiency, Indian Sugar Manufacturing Units, DEA, Input /Output Oriented.Abstract
Data Envelopment analysis (DEA) has been used to calculate the technical and scale efficiency measures of the public and private sugar manufacturing firms of the Indian Sugar Industry (2006 to 2010). Within DEA framework, the input&Output oriented Variable Returns to Scale (VRS)&Constant Return to Scale (CRS) model is employed for the study of Decision making units (DMUs). A representative sample of 43 firms which account for major portion of the total market share is studied. The selection criterion for the inclusion of a firm in the analysis was the total sales of INR 5,000 million or more in the year 2010. After reviewing the literature it is found that no study has been conducted in the context of Indian sugar manufacturing firms in the Post-liberalization era which motivates us to initiate the study.Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
References
Banker, R. D. and Thrall, R. M. (1992). Estimation of Returns to scale Using Data Envelopment Analysis, European Journal of Operational Research, 62, pp.7484
Banker, R.D., A. Chornes and W.W. Cooper(1984) Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis. Management Science, 30, pp 1078-92.
Bernard D'Mello (2010). Innovation, imitation and dependence: iron and steel technology in India, 1970-1990. International Journal of Technology and Globalisation. 5(1 &2), pp. 114-123.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W. and Rhodes, W.E. (1978). Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, pp. 429-444.
Cheng, H., Lu, Y., & Chung, J. (2010). Assurance region contextdependent DEA with an application to Taiwanese hotel industry. International Journal of Operational Research. 8(3), pp. 292-312
Coelli,T. A. (1998). Guide to DEAR Version 2-1: A Data Envelopment Analysis (Computer) Program. Working Paper 96/08, CEPA, UNE, Australia.
Fore R. and C.A.K. Lovell (1978). Measuring the Technical Efficiency of Production. Journal of Economic Theory, 19, pp. 150-162.
Fare, R., S. Grosskpf and Lovell, C. A. K. (1985). The Measurement of Efficiency of Production. Kluwer Nijhoff Publishing, Boston.
Parrel, Michael J. (1957). Measurement of Productive Efficiency. Journal of Royal Statistical Society Series A, General, 120(3), pp. 253-82.
Feroz, E.H., Kim, S. and Raab, R.L (2003). Financial Statement Analysis: A Data Envelopment Analysis Approach. Journal of Operational Research Society. 54, pp.48-58.
Hua, Z. & Bian, Y. (2008). Performance measurement for network DEA with undesirable factors. International Journal of Management and Decision Making. 9(2), pp. 141-153.
Meeusen, W., and J. Van den Broeck (1977). Efficiency Estimation from Cobb-Douglas Production Function with Composed Error. International Economics Review, 18, pp 435-44.
Shiu, A. (2002). Efficiency of Chinese Enterprises. The Journal of Productivity Analysis, 8(3), pp. 255267.
Topuz, J. C.et.al. (2005). Technical, Allocative and Scale Efficiencies of REITs: An Empirical Inquiry. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 32(9).
Worthington, A.C. (1999). Measuring Technical Efficiency in Australian Credit Unions. The Manchester School, 67(2).
OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2011-2020, FAO, Pp. 123.