Competitive Differentiation through Intangibles – A Case Study of Maruti Suzuki Ltd.

Authors

  • Pradeep Kumar Singh The Institute of Cost Accountants of India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33516/rb.v47i3-4.49-70p

Keywords:

Competitive Differentiation, Unique Intangibles, Value Creation, Social & Relational Capital, Brand Image.

Abstract

Contemporary environment is very dynamic and challenging, a company who want to survive and grow only mantra is minimization of competition with differentiation in offering (whether their product or service) for retention of customer to enhance brand loyalty. Competitive differentiation is a new strategy when your product/solution is unique and no one has anything “on the truck†that can compete against your offering at all. Competitive Differentiation is one step ahead from normal differentiation; indicates how a company is going to minimize competition using differentiation as a tool in the light of competitive strategy.

Competitive differentiation is possible by unique intangibles in current era. Unique intangible assets are those intangibles which are not common in nature or different status for value creation process and specific advantages offers to a corporate. According to the nature of different industries and corporate’s different types of information’s, internal structures, agreements are exist which are main source of wealth creation.

This research paper explicates conceptual understanding of Competitive differentiation, value creation & role of intangibles in general for top Indian corporate’s and as a special case study for Maruthi Suzuki ltd as an automobile company. Researcher analyzes their product offerings, service, brand image which creates a competitive differentiation in the contemporary market. Applying content analysis as tool, finally researcher finds some specific initiatives such as brand management and facelift of models, strong R&D network and skilled engineers, creation of patent every year, strong sales & service outlets, focus on customer’s engagement initiative, Digitalisation and Innovation and accessories etc. are the important intangible segment which creates competitive differentiation for Maruthi Suzuki ltd.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2022-06-17

How to Cite

Singh, P. K. (2022). Competitive Differentiation through Intangibles – A Case Study of Maruti Suzuki Ltd. Research Bulletin, 47(3-4), 49–70. https://doi.org/10.33516/rb.v47i3-4.49-70p

References

Annual report of Maruti Suzuki India ltd 2017018 to 2020-21.

Bhasin, Madan (2007). Intangible capital reporting: Challenges of standardization and harmonization. The Chartered Accountant, 55(12), 1842-58.

Chakraborty P.K. (2006). Shareholders value creation: the pressing corporate agenda. The Chartered Accountant, 54 (11), 1647-50.

Chandna Tilak (2008). A study of intellectual capital reporting in India. The Chartered Accountant, 56(12), 1991-2000.

Dani, Richa (2010). Valuation practices in emerging market: Issues involved in various areas.The Chartered Accountant, 58(7), 1134-39.

Das, Bhagabasn & Parmanik, Alok (2006). Measuring knowledge assets: A look to the future. The Management Accountant, 41(12), 936-40.

Dutta, Swarup Kumar (2008), Intangible Assets as a Source of Competitive Advantage Look No Further, Effective Executive, April, pp 46.

Ernest and Young (2014): Special Report on Integrated Reporting Elevating Value,

Fernandez, Pablo (2002). Valuation methods and shareholder value creation. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.

Ghosh, Subhajit (2008). Knowledge assets: An underestimated attribute to be identified and quantified. The Management Accountant, 43(9), 688704.

Jhunjhunwala,Shital (2005). Does the market understand Intangibles? The Chartered Accountant, 54(01), 123127.

Joishy N. Gurudutt (2008). Valuation for intangible assets. The Chartered Accountant, 56(08), 1291-98.

Kaplan, Robert S. and Norton, David P. (2004). Measuring the strategic readiness of intangible assets. Harvard Business Review, (2), 2-10.

Lev, B. and Zambon, S. (2003). Intangibles and intellectual capital: an introduction to a special issue. European Accounting Review, 12 (04).

Madhani, Pankaj M. (2009), Management of Intangible Assets: A Value Enhancing Strategy In Knowledge Economy.

Madhani, Pankaj M. (2012). Intangible Assets: Value Drivers for Competitive Advantage, Best Practices in Management Accounting,(4),147-164

Pai, T.V. Mohandas & Bal Krishnan, V. (1999). Intangible assets valuating: the invisible. The Chartered Accountant, XLVII (7).

Pradhan, Bibhuti B. (2004). Value reporting–A perspective study in India. The Journal of Accounting and Finance, 18 (2), 51-60.

Prahalad C.K. (2000). Strategies for the bottom of the economic pyramid: India as a source of innovation. REFLECTIONS, 03(04), 6-14.

Rathore, P. K &Prajapati, Sangita (2010). Reporting and disclosure of intangible assets of selected IT companies in India. The Chartered Accountan,t58(11), 1766-74.

Sarker, Sidhratha (2006). Invisible value: the care of measuring organizational Intellectual Capital. The Management Accountant, 41(03), 200204.

Singh, Pradeep Kumar (2014). “Shareholder Value Creation Through Unique Intangibles: Evidence From Selected Firm Listed in Bombay Stock Exchange†Journal of Contemporary Research in Management, 9(4) OctDec, 1-14

Subhas,C. Vishakha. (2011). A study on intangible assets disclosure: evidence from Indian companies. Intangible Capital, 7(1), 1-30.

Vohra Neharika & Mukul Kumar (2009). Relevance of Peter Drucker’s Work: Celebrating Drucker’s 100th Birthday, Vikalpa, 34 (4),p 1-7.