Does a Corporate Governance Aspect Matter for Business Responsibility Reporting Readability?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33516/rb.v44i1.69-81pKeywords:
BR Report (BRR), Readability, Corporate Governance Attribute, Content Analysis, Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI).Abstract
Study empirically investigates the impact of corporate governance attributes on companies’ reading ease choice to disclose Business Responsibility (BR) Report information since corporate governance ensures transparent, fair, credible and responsible corporate behaviors to its stakeholders. The corporate governance attributes used in the study are board size, board committee, board independence, female on board. BR readability measure and corporate governance variables are measured and extracted from a checklist of items based on SEBI’s BRR suggested framework 2012 and for BR report readability, Flesch K reading ease has been calculated from selected companies annual BR reports and websites respectively.
Empirical evidence on the link between corporate governance and BR report readability of top listed companies is scarce or unavailable. Given the positive impact corporate governance attributes have on the extent of BR disclosure readability (reading ease); their role can be further strengthened in terms of overseeing quality of information disclosed. Stakeholders and regulators will need to develop greater awareness of firm BR disclosure biases associated with ownership and more carefully scrutinize firm’s foggy and smoggy BR information’s that firms are reporting on. Readability analysis of BR reports disclosure has been a strong research theme in the fields of corporate governance and business communication.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
References
Adelberg, A. II, (1983). The Accounting Syntactic Complexity Formula: A New Instrument for Predicting the Readability of Selected Accounting Communications‘, Accounting and Business Research. Summer, Pg. 162-175
Adelberg, A. H. (1979). Narrative Disclosures Contained in Financial Reports: Means of Communication or Manipulation?, Accounting and Business Research. Summer, pp. 179-189.
Adams, G. R. & Schvaneveldt, I D. (1985). Understanding Research Methods. Longman.
American Accounting Association (1966). A Statement of Basic Accountancy Theory, American Accounting Association, p. 1.
Black, J. A. & Champion, D. J. (1976), Methods and Issues in Social Research. Wiley and Sons, New York.
Carsberg, B., Hope, A. & Scapens, R, W. (1974). The Objectives of Published Accounting Reports, Accounting and Business Research, Summer, pp. 162-173.
Clatworthy, M. & Jones, M.J. (2001). The effect of thematic structure on the variability of annual report readability. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 311-26.
Courtis, J. K. (1986). An Investigation into Annual Report Readability and Corporate Risk Return Relationships, Accounting and Business Research. Autumn, pp. 285-294.
Courtis, John K; Salleh Hassan (2002). Reading ease of bilingual annual reports. The Journal of Business Communication, pp. 394- 413.
Dolphin, R. & Wagley, R. A. (1977). Reading the Annual Report, Financial Executive. pp. 20-22.
Duffy, T. M. and Kabance, P. (1982). Testing a Readable Writing Approach to Text Revision, Journal of Educational Psychology. Vol. 4, No. 5, pp. 733-748.
England, G. W., Thomas, M. & Paterson, D. G. (1953). Reliability of the Original and the Simplified Flesch Reading Ease Formulas, Journal of Applied Psychology. Vol. 37, No. 2, pp. 111-118. 1982.
Farr, J. N., Jenkins, J. J. & Paterson, D. G. (1951). Simplification of Flesch Reading Ease Formula, Journal of Applied Psychology. Vol. 35, pp. 333-335.
Freund, J. E. & Williams, F. J. (1977). Elementary Business Statistics - the Modern Approach. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.
Flesch, R. (1949). The Art of Readable Writing, Harper and Urns, New York.
Griesinger, W. S. & Klene, R. R. (1984). Readability of Introductory Psychology Textbooks: Flesch versus Student Ratings, Teaching of Psychology. Vol. II, No. 2,.
Haggle, 0. (1984). The Annual Report as an Aid to Communication & Accountancy. pp. 66—69.
Hopwood A. (1983). On Trying to Study Accounting in the Context in which it Operates, Accounting, Organizations and Society. Vol. 8, No. 2/3, pp. 287-305.
Haried, A. A. (1973). Measurement of Meaning in Financial Reports, Journal of Accounting Research. pp. 117-145.
Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales (1969). Statement of Intent on Accounting Standards in the 1970s, reproduced in Accountancy, January 1970, pp. 2-3.
Jones, M. J. (1988). A Longitudinal Study of the Readability of the Chairman‘s Narratives in the Corporate Reports of a UK Company.
Accounting and Business Research. Vol. 18, Iss. 72; p. 297-306.
Jones, M.J. and Shoemaker, P.A. (1994). Accounting narratives: a review of empirical studies of content and readability, Journal of Accounting Literature. Vol. 13, pp. 142-84.
Kaplan, R. S. (1986). The Role for Empirical Research in Management Accounting, Accounting, Organizations and Society. Vol. II, No. 4/5, pp. 429-452.
Klare, R. (1974). Assessing Readability, Reading Research Quarterly. Vol. 10. pp. 62102.
Li, F. (2008). Annual report readability, current earnings, and earnings persistence, Journal of Accounting and Economics. Vol. 45, Nos 2/3, pp. 221-47.
Lee, T. A. & Tweedie, D. P. (1976). The Private Shareholder: his Source of Financial Information and his Understanding of Reporting Practices, Accounting and Business Research, Autumn, pp. 304-314.
Lewis, N. R., Parker, L. D., Pound, 0. D. & Sutcliffe, P. (1986). Accounting Report Readability Techniques, Accounting and Business Research. Summer, pp. 199-209.
Merkl-Davies, D. & Brennan, N. (2007). Discretionary disclosure strategies in corporate narratives: Incremental information or impression management? Journal of Accounting Literature, Vol. 26, pp. 116-96.
Morton, J. K. (1974). Qualitative Objectives of Financial Accounting: A Comment on Relevance and Moroney, Facts and Figures. 3rd. ed., Penguin, Harmondsworth.
Stead, B. A. (1977). Contents Analysis and Readability Formulas as Applied to the Accounting Principles Board, Options Journal of Business Communication, Vol. 14, pp. 2334.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (1995). Educational Statistics Yearbook Volume I, OECD Publications, Paris.
Pound, 0. D. (1981). A Note on Audit Report Readability, Accounting and Finance. May, pp. 45-55.
Parker, L. D. (1982). Corporate Annual Reporting: A Mass Communication Perspective‘, Accounting and Business Research. Autumn, pp. 279-286.
Regazzi, 3. H. (1974). Why aren‘t Financial Statements Understood?, Journal of Accountancy. April, pp. 48-55.
Rickwood, C., Coates, J. and Stacey, R. (1987). Managed Costs and the Capture of Information, Accounting and Business Research. Spring, pp. 319-326.
Smith, I. E. and Smith, N. p. (1971). Readability: A Measure of Performance of the Communication Function of Financial Reporting‘, Accounting Review. July, pp. 552561.
Smith, M. and Taffler, R. (1984). Improving the Communication Function of Published Accounting Statements‘, Accounting and Business Research. Spring, pp. 139-146.
Singhvi, S. S. and Desai, H. B. (1971). An Empirical Analysis of the Quality of Corporate Financial Disclosure‘, Accounting Review. January, pp. 129-138.
Taylor, P. and Dunning, D. (1977), Statistics for Business, Polytechnic Publishers, Stockport.
Tomkins, C. and Groves, R. (1983). The Everyday Accountant and Researching his Reality, Accounting, Organizations and Society. Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 361-374.
Tricker, R. 1. (1978). Research in Accounting: Purpose, Process and Potential, University of Glasgow.
Understandability Techniques, Journal of Accounting Research, Autumn, pp. 288-298.
Wonnacott, T. H. and Wonnacolt, R. J. (1981). Regression: A Second Course in Statistics. J. Wiley & Sons: New York.
Wall, W. D. and Williams, H. L. (1970). Longitudinal Studies and the Social Sciences. Heinemann, London.
Yin, R. K (1985). Case Study Research, Sage Publications, Beverley Hills.