Is Foreign Direct Investment delivering what it promised? Empirical Evidence from Indian Healthcare Industry

Authors

  • Satabdee Banerjee

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33516/rb.v43i2.84-96p

Keywords:

ARDL, Drugs & Pharmaceutical (D&P) Sector, FDI, Stationarity, Toda-Yamamoto Approach to Granger Non-causality.

Abstract

Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) was permitted in the Indian Drugs&Pharmaceutical (D&P) sector with the expectations of additional capital influx, technology spillover, improved managerial practices, export promotion and import substitution. But as the prime aim of the foreign investors is profit augmentation and market capture by way of Brownfield acquisitions, the accessibility and affordability of essential drugs and healthcare services are going way beyond the reach of the Indian commoners. Contextually, using the Auto Regressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) model and the Toda- Yamamoto approach to Granger non-causality, the present paper attempts to identify whether there is actually any role of FDI in improving the performance of the D&P sector of India or not. The study finds no conclusive evidence of long run cointegrating relationship between FDI equity inflows in Indian D&P sector and the sectoral stock index, and export and import of pharma products. In the short run, the sectoral stock index, exports and imports of Indian D&P sector, taken together, is found to granger cause FDI equity inflows, but it is not the other way round.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2017-07-01

How to Cite

Banerjee, S. (2017). Is Foreign Direct Investment delivering what it promised? Empirical Evidence from Indian Healthcare Industry. Research Bulletin, 43(2), 84–96. https://doi.org/10.33516/rb.v43i2.84-96p

Issue

Section

Articles

References

Abrol, D., Dhulap, S., Aisola, M., & Singh, N. (2016, March). Pharmaceuticals, Product Patent and TRIPS Implementation. Working Paper 191 . Institute for Studies in Industrial Development.

Banerjee, S. (2013). How Equity Contribution through FDI in Retail might Impact the Growth & Development of Indian Economy. Emerging Issues in Finance Leading Thoughts and Ideas (pp. 106-119). Kolkata: Elegant Publishers.

Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion. (2015). Consolidated FDI Policy. New Delhi: Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Government of India.

Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion. (2016). Consolidated FDI Policy. New Delhi: Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Government of India.

Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, D. A. (1981). The Likelihood Ratio Statistics For Autoregressive Time Series With a Unit Root. Econometrica , 49 (4), 1057-1072.

Elliott, G., Rothenberg, T. J., & Stock, J. H. (1996). Efficient Tests for an Autoregressive Unit Root. Econometrica , 64 (4), 813-836.

Giles, D. (2011, April 29). Testing for Granger Causality. (D. Giles, Editor) Retrieved December 15, 2016, from Econometrics Beat: Dave Giles' Blog: https://davegiles.blogspot.in/2011/04/testin g-for-granger-causality.html#comment-form

http://www.bseindia.com

http://www.ipekpp.com

https://www.cmie.com

India Brand Equity Foundation. (2017). Pharmaceuticals. India Brand Equity Foundation.

Jhunjhunwala, R., & Sah, S. (2013). FDI in Pharmaceutical Sector: Past, Present and Future. Khaitan & Co.

Johansen, J., & Juselius, K. (1990). Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inference on Cointegration with Application to the Demand for Money. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics.

Joseph, R. K. (2012). Policy Reforms in the Indian Pharmaceutical Sector since 1994 Impact on Exports and Imports. Economic & Political Weekly , XLVII (18), 62-72.

Joseph, R. K., & Ranganathan, K. (2016, February). Trends in Foreign Investment in Healthcare Sector of India. Working Paper 187 . Institute for Studies in Industrial Development.

Kumar, S. (2013). FDI in Pharmaceutical Sector. Rajya Sabha, Department Related Parliamentary Standing Committee on Commerce. New Delhi: Rajya Sabha Secretariat.

Pant, R. (2015). What's driving mergers and acquisitions in pharma industry? Ahmedabad: Business Standard.

Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (1997). Working with Microfit 4.0: Interactive Econometric Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics , 16 (3), 289-326.

Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. J. (1999, February). Bounds Testing Approaches to the Analysis of Long Run Relationships. Discussion Paper Series Number 46 . Edinburgh School of Economics.

Phillips, P., & Perron, P. (1988). Testing for a Unit Root in Time Series Regression. Biometrika , 75, 335-346.

Sahu, S. K., & Agarwal, N. (2015, September). Mergers and Acquisitions in the Indian Pharmaceutical Sector. Working Paper 122/2015 . Madras School of Economics.

Vyas, V., Narayanan, K., & Ramanathan, A. (2012). Determinants of Mergers and Acquisitions in Indian Pharmaceutical Industry. Eurasian Journal of Business and Economics, 5 (9), 79-102.

World Bank. (2016). World Development Indicator. World Bank Group.